Table 2.
Derived morphological Spergel parameters in submillimeter.
| ID | A | B | C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effective radiusmajor (**) | arcsec | 0.092 ± 0.004 | 0.148 ± 0.002 | 0.122 ± 0.054 |
| kpc | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 1.15 ± 0.01 | 0.95 ± 0.42 | |
| Ellipticity | 0.62 ± 0.03 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.47 ± 0.22 | |
| Position angle | degrees | −90.6 ± 0.6 | −27.4 ± 0.3 | −46.4 ± 0.6 |
| Δangledisk, bulge (1) | degrees | – | 3.4 ± 1.5 | 2.9 ± 1.5 |
| Spergel index (2) | −0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | −0.5 ± 0.3 |
Notes. (1) The difference between position angles of the stellar disk in HST F160W and that of the submillimeter core. The lack of a value in case of Galaxy-A is due to its stellar emission having a complex morphology without a clear position angle for the whole galaxy. (2) Spergel index values 0.5 and −0.6 correspond to Sérsic indices 1 and 4 respectively. (**) ∼ effective radius of the corresponding Sérsic profile, as has been determined through modeling Sérsic and Spergel profiles (Tan et al., in prep.).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.