Table 2.
Summary of the best-fit results to the observed relations shown in Fig. 1, as reported in Sect. 2.
| Data sets | Intercept | Slope | χ2/d.o.f. |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1/2, a vs. MBH | 15.89 ± 0.11 | 0.97 ± 0.30 | 11.5/13 |
| R1/2, b vs. MBH | 16.01 ± 0.11 | 0.97 ± 0.30 | 11.5/13 |
| L3000 vs. MBH | 45.53 ± 0.16 | 1.57 ± 0.34 | 11.6/9 |
| L3000 vs. MBH ( † ) | 45.60 ± 0.14 | 1.43 ± 0.38 | 11.8/8 |
| L3000 vs. R1/2, a | 45.90 ± 0.20 | 1.60 ± 0.55 | 16.5/8 |
Notes. ( † )Best-fit results to the luminosity vs BH mass relation when we exclude RXJ 1131 and we consider intrinsic absorption to three quasars (i.e. results listed in this row are the aL, obs − 2 and bL, obs − 2 values reported in the text).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.