Open Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629711]


Table 1

Value of the MAC in the polyethylene matrix for the glassy samples X35, X4O, X5OA, and X5OB compared with that for the silicate component of cosmic dust models in polyethylene.

Mass absorption coefficient in polyethylene (cm2 g −l·)
100 μm 250 μm 500 μm 850 μm 1 mm
10 K 300 K 10 K 300 K 10 K 300 K 10 K 300 K 10K 300 K
X35 194.6 217.2 19.2 30.1 2.0 5.2 0.4 1.8 0.2 1.4
X4O 200.9 216.9 68.6 74.7 25.4 31.3 7.9 14.0 5.0 11.2
X5OA 153.4 160.2 27.9 36.5 3.9 8.1 1.7 3.5 1.7 3.1
X5OB 136.8 152.2 36.5 39.9 10.2 12.8 2.9 4.8 2.0 3.5
<MACl)(1) 171.4 186.4 38.1 45.3 10.4 14.3 3.2 6.03 2.2 4.8
<MAC2)(2) 169.8 186.7 25.7 34.1 4.5 7.8 1.3 3.0 1.0 2.3
MAC sphere 0.1 μm(3) 82 12.6 2.8 1.15 0.9
MAC distrib spherical grains(3) 84.2 12.6 2.8 1.15 0.9
MAC CDE (3) 99.6 15.5 3.5 1.4 1.1

Notes. (1)〈MAC1〉 represents the MAC averaged over the four samples X35, X4O, X50, and X5OB. (2)〈MAC2〉 represents the MAC averaged over the sample X35 and the mean of the X50 and X5OB samples. (3)These MAC were calculated in an ambient medium of refractive index n = 1.51 (corresponding to PE) and using the optical constants of the astrosìl from Li & Draine (2001).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.