Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243508e]


Table 1.

Sample of the LG systems.

Galaxy Morph. Type N Method References
Milky Way satellites

SMC dIrr 3032 CaT Dobbie et al. (2014)
Fornax (Fnx) dSph 822 CaT Battaglia & Starkenburg (2012)
Leo I dSph 813 SpF Kirby et al. (2013b)
Sculptor (Scl) dSph 539 CaT Battaglia & Starkenburg (2012)
Leo II dSph 258 SpF Kirby et al. (2013b)
Carina (Car) dSph 392 CaT Koch et al. (2006)
Sextans (Sxt) dSph 162 CaT Battaglia et al. (2011)
Antlia II (AntlII) dSph 234 CaT Ji et al. (2021)
Ursa Minor (UMi) dSph 718 SpF Pace et al. (2020)
Draco (Dra) dSph 455 F-SpF Walker et al. (2015)
Canes Venatici I (CVenI) dSph 163 SpF Kirby et al. (2013b)
Crater II (CratII) dSph 81 CaT Ji et al. (2021)

M31 satellites

M32 cE 64 CaT Ho et al. (2015b)
NGC 205 (N205) dE 224 CaT Ho et al. (2015b)
NGC 185 (N185) dE 321 CaT Ho et al. (2015b)
NGC 147 (N147) dE 230 CaT Ho et al. (2015b)
Andromeda VII (AndVII) dSph 104 CaT Ho et al. (2015b)
Andromeda II (AndII) dSph 300 CaT Ho et al. (2015b)
Andromeda V (AndV) dSph 81 SpF Kirby et al. (2020)

Local Group Isolated

NGC 6822 (N6822) dIrr 279 SpF Kirby et al. (2013b)
IC 1613 dIrr 296 CaT Taibi et al. (in prep.)
WLM dIrr 126 CaT Leaman et al. (2013)
UGC 4879 (VV124) dTr 63 SpF Kirby et al. (2013a)
Leo A dIrr 113 SpF Kirby et al. (2017)
Pegasus-DIG (PegDIG) dIrr 95 SpF Kirby et al. (2013b)
Sagittarius-DIG (SagDIG) dIrr 43 SpF Kirby et al. (2017)
Cetus (Cet) dSph 54 CaT Taibi et al. (2018)
Aquarius (Aqu) dIrr 45 CaT Hermosa Muñoz et al. (2020)
Phoenix (Phx) dTr 193 CaT Kacharov et al. (2017)
Tucana (Tuc) dSph 54 CaT Taibi et al. (2020)

Notes. Columns show from left to right the galaxies (with the abbreviations used in the figures), the corresponding morphological type (dwarf spheroidal – dSph; compact or dwarf elliptical – cE or dE; dwarf irregular or transition type – dIrr or dTr), the number of probable member stars within each dataset (for Sextans and Sculptor, we adopt the membership criteria as in Cicuéndez et al. 2018 and Iorio et al. 2019, respectively), the method used to obtain the metallicities (by direct fit of the available Fe I absorption lines – SpF; by full spectral fitting using synthetic spectra – F-SpF; applying the calibration between the equivalent width of the Ca II triplet lines and [Fe/H] – labelled CaT), and references to the original catalogues.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.