Table 1.
Comparison between the original mocks, the sub-sampled mocks and the Gold Sample SOM.
| Bin |
 (J21) |
 (Sub-sampled) |
 (Gold Sample) |
neff (J21) | neff (Sub-sampled) | neff (Gold Sample) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.26 | 0.85 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| 2 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 1.56 | 1.19 | 1.18 |
| 3 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 2.23 | 1.86 | 1.85 |
| 4 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 1.52 | 1.27 | 1.26 |
| 5 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.39 | 1.32 | 1.31 |
Notes. Here we present a comparison between characteristics from the sub-sampled and original redshift distributions from Egretta mocks with the Gold Sample SOM N(z)s from Hildebrandt et al. (2021). The original mock values from Joachimi et al. (2021b) are labelled as J21 and values labelled as sub-sampled are the ones used in this work.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.