Table B.1
Astrometric solutions for µ2 Sco in the recent literature. The values adopted throughout this paper combine proper motions by Kervella et al. (2019) and the kinematic parallax based on membership to ELS. References: (1): Hipparcos (1997 reduction); (2): Hipparcos (2007 reduction); (3) Gaia DR2; (4) Gaia EDR3; (5) Kervella et al. (2019).
| Source | Πmas |  mas yr−1 |
µδmas yr−1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | 6.31 ± 0.86 | –12.92 ± 0.66 | –23.80 ± 0.61 |
| (2) | 6.88 ± 0.12 | –11.09 ± 0.13 | –23.32 ± 0.11 |
| (3) | 7.92 ± 0.55 | –9.98 ± 0.96 | –19.87 ± 0.78 |
| (4) | 5.66 ± 0.28 | –12.11 ± 0.30 | –22.57 ± 0.27 |
| (5) | — | –11.77 ± 0.02 | –23.11 ± 0.02 |
| adopted | 5.9 ± 0.2 | –11.77 ± 0.02 | –23.11 ± 0.02 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.