Table 4.
Molecular and 1.3 mm continuum effective radii determinations of the LIRG sample.
| Source | Reff | Flux (Reff) | AGN | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRAS/Other | 12CO | 1.3 mm | 12CO | 1.3 mm | |
| (pc) | (pc) | (Jy) | (mJy) | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
| ESO 297-G011 (N) | 598 ± 69 | 499 ± 54 | 161 ± 32 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | (y) |
| ESO 297-G012 (S) | 369 ± 65 | 152 ± 31 | 103 ± 21 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | |
| NGC 1614 | 634 ± 110 | 264 ± 29 | 340 ± 68 | 8.0 ± 1.6 | |
| ESO 557-G002 | 300 ± 57 | 64 ± 9 | 68 ± 14 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | |
| F06592-6313 | 310 ± 57 | 139 ± 24 | 67 ± 14 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | |
| NGC 2369 | 777 ± 189 | 404 ± 190 | 648 ± 129 | 11.5 ± 2.3 | (y) |
| NGC 3110 | 1134 ± 173 | 312 ± 50 | 236 ± 47 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | |
| NGC 3256 | 1279 ± 160 | 517 ± 356 | 1354 ± 269 | 10.7 ± 2.1 | |
| ESO 264-G036 | 755 ± 337 | 365 ± 15 | 755 ± 35 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | |
| ESO 319-G022 | 206 ± 36 | 68 ± 8 | 45 ± 9 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | |
| ESO 320-G030 | 381 ± 164 | 83 ± 10 | 401 ± 80 | 14.4 ± 2.9 | |
| ESO 267-G030 | 894 ± 182 | 374 ± 302 | 133 ± 27 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | (y) |
| MCG-02-33-098 E | 360 ± 58 | 210 ± 57 | 12 ± 2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | |
| MCG-02-33-098 W | 246 ± 58 | 126 ± 16 | 54 ± 11 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | |
| ESO 507-G070 | 325 ± 76 | 150 ± 25 | 180 ± 36 | 8.3 ± 1.7 | |
| NGC 5135 | 797 ± 104 | 666 ± 71 | 408 ± 81 | 9.4 ± 1.9 | (y) |
| IC 4518 E | 930 ± 196 | 865 ± 234 | 121 ± 23 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | |
| IC 4518 W | 497 ± 95 | 147 ± 45 | 125 ± 25 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | (y) |
| F17138-1017 | 897 ± 146 | 738 ± 25 | 253 ± 51 | 4.9 ± 1.0 | |
| IC 4687 | 1154 ± 191 | 1256 ± 169 | 214 ± 43 | 5.2 ± 1.1 | |
| IC 4734 | 366 ± 89 | 164 ± 19 | 192 ± 38 | 4.7 ± 0.9 | |
| NGC 7130 | 699 ± 219 | 160 ± 29 | 332 ± 66 | 5.2 ± 1.0 | (y) |
| IC 5179 | 1182 ± 198 | 844 ± 349 | 394 ± 78 | 3.0 ± 0.6 | |
| NGC 7469 | 701 ± 89 | 405 ± 63 | 344 ± 69 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | (y) |
Notes. Column (1): Source name (IRAS and other). Cols. (2, 3): Effective radius derived for the CO(2–1) line and 1.3 mm continuum emissions using the CoG method. The uncertainties associated to the derivation of the Reff were derived as half the difference between the Reff derived at 4σ and 6σ, considered as the major source of uncertainty for the derivation of this parameter (i.e., ΔReff = (Reff, 4σ − Reff, 6σ)/2). Cols. (4, 5): Flux within the effective radius derived for the CO(2–1) line and 1.3 mm continuum emissions. The uncertainties were derived as half the difference between the flux within the Reff derived at 4σ and 6σ (i.e., ΔF (Reff) = 
). Col. (6): Presence of an AGN in the galaxy identified by (y) (see Table 1 for further details).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.