Table 5.
Comparison of our results with some findings from the literature (see Sect. 1), where several methods to analyze the dependence of AGN variability on MBH, λE, and Lbol were used.
| Publication | Method | Amplitude | Timescale | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBH | λE | Lbol | MBH | λE | Lbol | ||
| This work | SF | N | A | A | – | – | – |
| Wilhite et al. (2008) | SF | C | A | A | – | – | – |
| MacLeod et al. (2010) | DRW | C | AA | AA | C | – | N |
| Kelly et al. (2013) | PSD | A | A | A | – | – | – |
| Simm et al. (2016) | EV, PSD | N | A | A | N | N | N |
| Caplar et al. (2017) | SF | C | – | AA | – | – | C |
| Sánchez-Sáez et al. (2018) | SF | N | A | – | – | – | – |
| Laurenti et al. (2020) | SF | C | A | AA | – | – | – |
Notes. The table reports (left to right): reference paper; method applied for the analysis; dependence of amplitude/timescale on MBH, λE, and Lbol. C = correlation (CC = strong); A = anticorrelation (AA = strong); N = no relation found; – = dependence not investigated.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.