Open Access
Table C.1.
Comparison of nucleation with Turner et al. (2012).
| Nucleation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDS ID | FCC | Turner et al. | This work | Remarks |
| FDS10_0000 | FCC177 | Y | N | Our multi-component model fitted the central structure as a bulge rather than a nucleus. |
| FDS10_0189 | FCC203 | Y | N | No clear sign of a nucleus at the centre in our residual images; possibly an offset nucleus. |
| FDS11_0000 | FCC193 | Y | N | Sign of positive residuals in our model without a nucleus component, although the model including a nucleus component does not offer any improvement in the residuals (ΔBIC < 0). |
| FDS13_0000 | FCC249 | Y | N | No clear sign of a nucleus at the centre in our residual images |
| FDS11_0001 | FCC184 | N | Y | Our residual images clearly shows a nucleus and is well fitted by including a nucleus component. |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.