Free Access

Table 3

Comparison of RM analyses.

Instruments Analysis Parameters

υ sin i (ms−1) λ (°)
ESPRESSO Classical RM 272.034.0+40.0$272.0_{ - 34.0}^{ + 40.0}$ 102.518.5+17.2$102.5_{ - 18.5}^{ + 17.2}$
ESPRESSO Reloaded RM 292.949.9+41.9$292.9_{ - 49.9}^{ + 41.9}$ 107.519.3+23.6$107.5_{ - 19.3}^{ + 23.6}$
ESPRESSO RM Revolutions 300.557.0+45.9$300.5_{ - 57.0}^{ + 45.9}$ 114.117.8+22.8$114.1_{ - 17.8}^{ + 22.8}$
HARPS/HARPS-N Bourrier et al. (2018b) 33066+91$330_{ - 66}^{ + 91}$ 7224+33$72_{ - 24}^{ + 33}$
HARPS/HARPS-N RM Revolutions 290.1147.9+127.7$290.1_{ - 147.9}^{ + 127.7}$ 102.450.4+57.4$102.4_{ - 50.4}^{ + 57.4}$
HARPS/HARPS-N/ESPRESSO RM Revolutions 293.552.2+43.7$293.5_{ - 52.2}^{ + 43.7}$ 113.517.3+23.3$113.5_{ - 17.3}^{ + 23.3}$

Notes. The analysis from Bourrier et al. (2018b) was performed with an older version of the Reloaded RM technique and a different reduction of the CCFs.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.