Resulting posterior distributions on ω and Ω_m for different stellar mass corrections (LEPHARE-NL stellar mass correction in orange and average stellar mass correction in green) compared to the fit using the original stellar masses from Betoule et al. (2014) in blue. The contour levels correspond, from inside out, to 68%, 95%, and 99% of the posterior distribution. We show as stars (same colours as contours) the best-fit value for each configuration. Vertical and horizontal lines indicate the best-fit value of each parameter for the three different setups. There is no significant difference on the constraints when using the mass-corrected dataset with respect to the fiducial model. We find small differences in the best-fit values (star symbols), with the LEPHARE-NL stellar mass correction configuration showing the largest difference with respect to the fiducial model.