Table 2.
Mean iron abundance, errors, dispersion, and trend obtained from different setups, compared with H16 and J20.
Lib. | [α/Fe] | λλ (nm) | I | ⟨[Fe/H]⟩ | ϵ(Teff) | ϵ([Fe/H]) | σ([Fe/H]) | τ([Fe/H]) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
Husser et al. (2016) | ||||||||
GSL | 0 | 475 − 930 | C | −1.995 | 46 | 0.080 | 0.103 | 0.21 |
Jain et al. (2020) | ||||||||
MIL | SN | 475 − 740 | P | −2.086 | 56 | 0.078 | 0.095 | −0.05 |
GSL | 0.4 | 475 − 930 | L | −1.966 | 41 | 0.060 | 0.081 | 0.15 |
Q | −1.942 | 40 | 0.063 | 0.084 | 0.17 | |||
C | −1.945 | 41 | 0.059 | 0.082 | 0.18 | |||
GSL | 0.4 | 475 − 740 | L | −2.186 | 50 | 0.131 | 0.137 | 0.28 |
Q | −2.180 | 50 | 0.134 | 0.142 | 0.28 | |||
C | −2.167 | 51 | 0.133 | 0.139 | 0.25 | |||
GSL | 0.4 | 475 − 580 | L | −2.224 | 56 | 0.146 | 0.159 | 0.33 |
Q | −2.218 | 55 | 0.147 | 0.164 | 0.33 | |||
C | −2.203 | 57 | 0.149 | 0.165 | 0.31 | |||
GSL | 0 | 475 − 930 | L | −1.727 | 42 | 0.063 | 0.086 | 0.19 |
Q | −1.704 | 42 | 0.061 | 0.082 | 0.16 | |||
C | −1.712 | 42 | 0.061 | 0.082 | 0.16 | |||
GSL | 0 | 475 − 740 | L | −2.066 | 48 | 0.130 | 0.135 | 0.22 |
Q | −2.055 | 48 | 0.133 | 0.143 | 0.23 | |||
C | −2.047 | 48 | 0.125 | 0.131 | 0.21 | |||
GSL | 0 | 475 − 580 | L | −2.129 | 56 | 0.151 | 0.168 | 0.34 |
Q | −2.123 | 56 | 0.154 | 0.174 | 0.34 | |||
C | −2.109 | 56 | 0.154 | 0.171 | 0.33 | |||
AP18 | 0.5 | 475 − 930 | L | −2.031 | 41 | 0.055 | 0.079 | 0.20 |
Q | −2.015 | 40 | 0.052 | 0.075 | 0.21 | |||
C | −2.014 | 41 | 0.052 | 0.075 | 0.21 | |||
AP18 | 0.5 | 475 − 740 | L | −1.945 | 48 | 0.086 | 0.113 | 0.46 |
Q | −1.928 | 47 | 0.086 | 0.112 | 0.46 | |||
C | −1.925 | 47 | 0.084 | 0.111 | 0.46 | |||
AP18 | 0.5 | 475 − 580 | L | −2.092 | 61 | 0.129 | 0.137 | 0.39 |
Q | −2.074 | 62 | 0.128 | 0.134 | 0.40 | |||
C | −2.073 | 62 | 0.127 | 0.134 | 0.41 | |||
AP18 | 0 | 475 − 930 | L | −1.650 | 42 | 0.058 | 0.081 | 0.24 |
Q | −1.636 | 41 | 0.056 | 0.079 | 0.25 | |||
C | −1.635 | 42 | 0.056 | 0.079 | 0.25 | |||
AP18 | 0 | 475 − 740 | L | −1.758 | 50 | 0.089 | 0.120 | 0.47 |
Q | −1.744 | 50 | 0.091 | 0.122 | 0.47 | |||
C | −1.741 | 50 | 0.091 | 0.121 | 0.47 | |||
AP18 | 0 | 475 − 580 | L | −1.925 | 62 | 0.145 | 0.148 | 0.42 |
Q | −1.908 | 63 | 0.143 | 0.147 | 0.44 | |||
C | −1.907 | 63 | 0.143 | 0.146 | 0.45 | |||
APC | 0.5 | 475 − 930 | L | −2.068 | 42 | 0.061 | 0.083 | 0.20 |
Q | −2.023 | 41 | 0.055 | 0.077 | 0.20 | |||
C | −2.013 | 40 | 0.051 | 0.074 | 0.22 |
Notes. (1) Grid or library; MIL stands for the MILES library (Sánchez-Blázquez et al. 2006) used in J20, and APC for the AP18 coarse grid. (2) [α/Fe] value; SN stands for solar neighbourhood, as the abundance pattern of the empirical library used by J20 is made of stars from this environment. (3) Wavelength range in nm. (4) Interpolation schema; L: linear, Q: quadratic, C: cubic, P: polynomial approximation; the cubic splines used in H16 are different from the cubic Beziér interpolation of FERRE used in our analyses. (5) ⟨[Fe/H]⟩ is the average of the mean iron abundance determined in five Teff bins of 250 K, for 5100 < Teff < 6350 K. (6) ϵ(Teff) is the mean uncertainty on Teff estimated from pairs of repeated observations, averaged in the five Teff bins. (7) ϵ([Fe/H]) is the mean uncertainty on [Fe/H]e estimated from pairs of repeated observations and computed in the same way as ϵ(Teff). (8) σ([Fe/H]) is the square root of the mean variance of [Fe/H]e in the same five bins. (9) τ([Fe/H]) is the equivalent iron abundance trend, computed as the difference of mean [Fe/H]e in the first and last bin.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.