Table 3.
Results of the CCSN simulation run for every subclass of CCSNe.
| CCSN Type | AB mag | PGIR ∼ ZTF r (Mpc) | PGIR ∼ ZTF g (Mpc) | N Expected | N Detected by WINTER ∼ ZTF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ib/c | −17.61 | 7.6 | 13.8 | 19 | 3.7 |
| IIb | −17.03 | 5.9 | 10.6 | 7 | 1.3 |
| IIP | −16.8 | 5.3 | 9.6 | 39 | 7.3 |
| IIL | −17.98 | 9.1 | 16.5 | 5 | 1.0 |
| IIn | −18.62 | 12.2 | 22.1 | 5 | 1.0 |
Notes. We report: the average absolute AB magnitude; the distance in Mpc where PGIR is more sensitive to extinguished CCSNe when compared to ZTF’s r band and g band; the number of expected of events in a five-year time period using the CCSN rate from Mattila et al. (2012) and subclass fractions from Li et al. (2011); and the number of events we expect WINTER to detect that ZTF misses.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.