Table 3
Parameters of the RHD simulations used in this work.
| Simulation | Stellar | M⋆ | L⋆ | R⋆ | Teff | logg | tavg | Grid | xbox |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| type | (M⊙) | (L⊙) | (R⊙) | (K) | (cgs) | (yr) | (grid points) | (R⊙) | |
| st29gm06n001 (a) | AGB | 1 | 6956.3 ± 547.4 | 350.43 ± 11.3 | 2814.7 ± 68.9 | −0.65 ± 0.03 | 25.35 | 2813 | 1381 |
| st35gm04n38 (b) | RSG | 5 | 41517.3 ± 1074.4 | 582.03 ± 4.7 | 3414.2 ± 16.8 | −0.40 ± 0.01 | 11.46 | 4013 | 1631 |
Notes. The first column shows the simulation name, and the following five columns show the stellar parameters such as the mass (M⋆), the average luminosity (L⋆), radius (R⋆), effective temperature(Teff), and surface gravity (logg). The different quantities are averaged over spherical shells and epochs (7th column, tavg). Errors are one standard-deviation fluctuations with respect to the time average (see Chiavassa et al. 2011a, 2009). The solar metallicity is assumed. (a)Simulation from the AGB grid of Freytag et al. (2017). (b)Simulation of the RSG star presented in detail in Kravchenko et al. (2019).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.