Open Access

Fig. C.1.

image

Download original image

Comparison between the measured line-of-sight velocity dispersion of the sample UDGs (grey error bars and/or shaded area) and the MOND prediction with EFE at the average distance dmean for different values of the stellar mass-to-light ratio M/L, assuming a radially biased anisotropy β = +0.5. The fiducial M/L ratio from Table 1, the best-fit M/L ratio recovering the effective velocity dispersion σeff, and the large bust still acceptable M/L = 4 are compared. As in Fig. 9, the plain and dotted light red curves recall the predicted radially biased velocity dispersion profiles in the isolated MOND and Newtonian cases, respectively (cf. Fig. 4).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.