Table 2
Summary of all tests and simulations outlined in Sect. 4.
| Case | nlines | RMS | Precision | K |  |
RMSres |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [m s−1] | [m s−1] | [m s−1] | [m s−1] | |||
| EV Lac | ||||||
| Full mask on 2010 | 3300 | 182 | 4 | 175 | 23.7 | 134 |
| Example run 10th percentile on 2010 | 666 | 79 | 11 | 105 | 1.2 | 30 |
| Example run 5th percentile on 2010 | 636 | 79 | 19 | 104 | 1.3 | 31 |
| Example run 1st percentile on 2010 | 198 | 67 | 14 | 93 | 1.2 | 30 |
| Union of best sub-masks on 2010 | 721 | 68 | 8 | 86 | 1.4 | 32 |
| Full mask on 2007 | 3300 | 225 | 5 | 129 | 60 | 204 |
| 2010-trained best sub-mask on 2007 | 198 | 118 | 17 | 142 | 6.2 | 66 |
| 2007-trained best sub-mask on 2007 | 26 | 82 | 16 | 77 | 5.7 | 64 |
| Full mask on 2006 | 3300 | 249 | 4 | 282 | 42.6 | 147 |
| 2006-trained best sub-mask on 2010 | 7 | 259 | 24 | 140 | 78.4 | 244 |
| Full mask on all epochs | 3300 | 242 | 5 | 101 | 62.7 | 231 |
| Union of 2010-trained sub-masks on all epochs | 721 | 69 | 7 | 96 | 15.2 | 113 |
| 2010-trained worst RMS-based sub-mask on 2010 | 83 | 13342 | 44 | 12718 | 1.3 ×105 | 10041 |
| Full mask on 2010 (T) | 3240 | 133 | 5 | 172 | 3.3 | 50 |
| 2010-trained worst RMS-based sub-mask on 2010 (T) | 2117 | 255 | 28 | 326 | 26.7 | 142 |
| 2010-trained worst K-based sub-mask on 2010 (T) | 2209 | 246 | 19 | 373 | 7.6 | 76 |
| AD Leo | ||||||
| Full mask on 2008 | 3300 | 110 | 2 | 80 | 14.2 | 100 |
| 2008-trained best sub-mask on 2008 | 524 | 26 | 5 | 42 | 0.3 | 13 |
| Union of EVLac-2010-trained best sub-masks on 2008 | 721 | 31 | 4 | 37 | 0.7 | 21 |
| DS Leo | ||||||
| Full mask on 2008 | 3300 | 37 | 2 | 23 | 1.5 | 34 |
| 2008-trained best sub-mask on 2008 | 571 | 20 | 3 | 18 | 0.35 | 16 |
| 2008-trained worst RMS-based sub-mask on 2008 | 800 | 143 | 6 | 51 | 24.4 | 138 |
| 2008-trained worst K-based sub-mask on 2008 | 845 | 59 | 3 | 20 | 4.2 | 57 |
| Full mask without worst RMS-based sub-mask on 2008 | 2500 | 29 | 2 | 29 | 0.64 | 22 |
Notes. The columns are: (1) specific (sub-)mask and epoch considered, (2) number of lines in the sub-mask, (3) RMS of the data set, (4) RV precision from the MC simulations, (5) semi-amplitude of the sinusoidal fit to the data set, (6) reduced χ2, and (7) RMS of the fit residuals. The symbol ‘T’ indicates that telluric windows are removed from the full mask. The number of observations for EV Lac are 20 in 2010, 15 in 2007, 7 in 2006; for AD Leo 14 in 2008; and for DS Leo 26 in 2008.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.