Table 2
Gaia detections of known close visual binaries.
PN | Sep.(a) | ΔV (b) | Rel.(c) | G | Mul.(d) | RUWE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(′′) | (mag) | (mag) | (%) | |||
Abell 31 | 0.26 | >6.8 | 1.00 | 15.5 | 0 | 1.03 |
Abell 33 | 1.80 (e) | 1.0 | 0.93 | 15.9 | 0 | 1.09 |
0.07 | 16.7 | 0 | 0.98 | |||
EGB 6 | 0.17 | … | 0.96 | 16.0 | 0 | 2.09 |
K 1-14 | 0.36 | 2.4 | 1.00 | 16.1 | 70 | 2.41 |
K 1-22 | 0.35 (e) | 0.3 | 0.83 | 16.7 | 88 | 3.47 |
0.17 | 16.7 | 79 | 2.94 | |||
K 1-27 | 0.56 | 5.1 | 1.00 | 16.0 | 0 | 0.90 |
Mz 2 | 0.28 | −1.3 | 0.98 | 16.8 | 0 | 0.97 |
NGC 1535 | 1.04 | 5.5 | 1.00 | 12.1 | 17 | 1.01 |
NGC 3132 | 1.70 (e) | −5.7 (f) | 0.81 | 10.0 | 0 | 1.84 |
0.19 | 16.1 | 16 | 2.07 | |||
NGC 6818 | 0.09 | 0.7 | 1.00 | 16.3 | 0 | 3.80 |
NGC 7008 | 0.42 | −1.5 | 1.00 | 13.7 | 93 | 6.07 |
Sp 3 | 0.31 | −3.7 | 1.00 | 13.1 | 45 | 3.02 |
Notes. Rows with blank first columns indicate the Gaia-detected companion of the (assumed) PN progenitor in the row above. Single rows indicate that Gaia has not resolved the pair. (a)Literature separation, except where noted. Most values are from Ciardullo et al. (1999), except for EGB 6 (Liebert et al. 2013) and NGC 6818 (Benetti et al. 2003). (b)Difference in HST V magnitude between ionising star and companion (a positive difference indicates companion is fainter). (c)Reliability. (d)IPD multipeak fraction. (e)Gaia value, within 0′′.02 of literature HST value. (f)The ionising starof NGC 3132 is thought to be the fainter of the pair, so highest reliability match here is not correct in that sense.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.