Table 3
Flattening ratio.
| Model | Analytical Rf | Measured Rf |
|---|---|---|
| apa | per | apa | per | |
| v05e00 | 0.39 | 1 |
| v05e25 | 0.36 |0.42 | Irr |
| v05e50 | 0.31 |0.44 | Irr |
| v10e00 | 0.57 | 0.5 |
| v10e25 | 0.53 |0.59 | Irr |
| v10e50 | 0.48 |0.61 | Irr |
| v20e00 | 0.72 | 0.6 |
| v20e25 | 0.69 |0.74 | 0.55 |0.6 |
| v20e50 | 0.65 |0.76 | 0.55 |0.7 |
Notes. Analytically predicted and measured flattening ratio Rf. The lower Rf, the stronger the flattening. For the eccentric models the values are given both at the companion apastron and companion periastron side as Rf(apa) | Rf(per). ‘Irr’ indicates models for which the flattening ratio could not be measured due to irregular structures. For interpretation of this ratio see Fig. 15.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.