Table 2
Comparing PACS and GREAT 205 μm integrated intensities.
| LOS ID (a) | I(PACS) (b) | I(PACS*) (c) | I(GREAT) | I(GREAT)/ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (K km s−1) | (K km s−1) | (K km s−1) | I(PACS*) | |
| G020.9+0.0 | 10.5 | 13.7 | 11.0 | 0.81 |
| G021.7+0.0 | 14.1 | 18.3 | 10.4(d) | 0.74 |
| G023.5+0.0 | 29.4 | 38.2 | 49.3 | 1.29 |
| G024.3+0.0 | 20.1 | 26.2 | 27.2 | 1.04 |
| G025.2+0.0 | 15.1 | 19.6 | <10.6(e) | <0.54 |
| G026.1+0.0 | 28.3 | 36.7 | 43.1 | 1.17 |
| G027.0+0.0 | 9.3 | 12.1 | 7.5 | 0.62 |
| G028.7+0.0 | 19.1 | 24.8 | 31.4 | 1.27 |
Notes. (a)We use the GOT C+ naming convention to identify the lines-of-sight ID (Langer et al. 2010; Goldsmith et al. 2015). (b)I(PACS) is taken from Goldsmith et al. (2015). (c)PACS* is scaled upfrom the value of PACS reported by Goldsmith et al. (2015) for [N II] 205 μm averaged over all 25 pixels (see text). (d)Two features are marginally detected in [N II] with GREAT (S∕N~3), however here the total integrated intensity is used which has a S∕N ~ 5. (e) The 3-σ upper limit for [N II].
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.