Fig. 3.

Model spectra of the radiative fountain model (green) and warped disk model (orange). The rows show different line-of-sight column densities. Left (right) column: a nearly edge-on (face-on) view of the obscurer. For comparison, a spherical obscurer (Brightman & Nandra 2011) and smooth torus (Murphy & Yaqoob 2009) are included as purple dashed and black dotted curves, respectively. In low column densities (bottom row) the predictions are similar. Right column: the radiative fountain predictions are absent because near-Compton-thick column densities only occur in the equatorial plane. Similarly, the torus is unobscured from this viewing angle and shows the input powerlaw. The models differ most in the 2−20 keV range under high obscuring column densities (top left panel). The warped disk produces the strongest emission near 20 keV among the models. Models are normalised at 200 keV. Centre right panel: included fluorescent lines.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.