Free Access

Table 6.

Mass-loss rates and accretion rates for outflow sources that have been mapped extensively in [O I]63.

Source Class D θ vt L([O I]) other & component acc(a) Main Refs.
(pc) (″) (km s−1) L (10−7M yr−1) (10−7M yr−1)
HH 111 IRS I 420 20 270 2.5 × 10−2 26−53 22.9−26.4 4 & CO (b) 27 (k) Sperling et al. (2020)
HH 111 jet 420 45 260 1.3 × 10−2 6−12 ≲10−16 2−6 & [O I]λ6300 (r)

SVS13A I 235 22 270 1.5 × 10−2 25−51 13.1−16.0 8.9 & [Fe II] (c) 140−170 (l) Sperling et al. (2020)
7.0 & H2(c)
30 & HI (d)
90 & low-J CO (e), swept-up gas

HH 34 IRS I 430 26 160 2.4 × 10−2 11−23 20.7−27.5 0.7 & [Fe II] (c) 35−115 (m) Sperling et al. (2020)
0.03 & H2(c)
∼1.5 & [O I]λ6300 (r)

L1448-C 0 232 45 170 1.8 × 10−3 1−2 2−4 ∼24 & SiO, SO, CO (f) 35 Nisini et al. (2015)

IRAS4A 0 235 38 100−140 9.1 × 10−4 0.3−1.0 1−2 ≳18 & SiO, SO, CO (g) 58 Nisini et al. (2015)

HH 46 I 450 59 300 2.0 × 10−2 7−15 20−40 15−28 & CO (v) 34 (n) Nisini et al. (2015)

BHR 71 0 200 33 50−100 3.2 × 10−3 1−3 3−6 21 & CO (t) 73 (o) Nisini et al. (2015)

VLA 1623 0 120 78 60 2.1 × 10−3 0.5−1 2−4 16−160 & CO 21 Nisini et al. (2015)
HH 211 SE lobe 0 250 51 115 3.92 × 10−3 1.2−2.4 3.9
HH 211 NW lobe 0 250 45 115 3.57 × 10−3 1.2−2.4 3.6
HH 211 both lobes 2.4−4.8 7.5 7−28 & SiO, CO, SO (h) 14 (p) Dionatos et al. (2018)
∼20−28 & H2(i)

IRAS 2A, blue lobe SN 0 235 188 50 3.5 × 10−3 0.1−0.3 3.5 200 & CO (u)
IRAS 2A, red lobe SN 0 235 133 50 4.1 × 10−3 0.2−0.4 4.1 400 & CO (u)
IRAS 2A, both lobes SN 0.3−0.7 7.6 6 & H2(j) 234 (q) Dionatos & Güdel (2017)
>6.7 & SiO, SO, CO (s)

Notes.

(a)

Calculated as described in Sect. 4.4.

(b)

Lefloch et al. (2007), the high-velocity outflowing gas is detected therein in the CO J = 7–6 transition. We therefore think that the stated mass-loss rate is connected to the jet itself and not to swept-up gas.

(e)

Calculated from Knee & Sandell (2000), from Table 1 therein we adopt the relevant values for the blue lobe of HH 7-11 ( = outv = 2.8 × 10−4 M km s−1 yr−1, v = 31 km s−1).

(f)

Podio et al. (2021), Lee (2020). The stated value is in good agreement with measurements of Yoshida et al. (2021).

(g)

Podio et al. (2021), Yıldız et al. (2015) measure out > 160 × 10−7 M yr−1 based on CO J = 6–5 observations (sum of both lobes).

(k)

The stated accretion rate is in good agreement with Lee (2010). Yang et al. (1997) estimate a higher value of 6.9 × 10−6M yr−1.

(l)

We estimate this accretion rate from the Brγ line (see Appendix C).

(m)

Based on measurements of accretion-induced emission lines Antoniucci et al. (2008) estimate an accretion rate of acc ∼ 41.1 × 10−7 M yr−1, whereas Nisini et al. (2016)acc ∼ 75 ± 40 × 10−7 M yr−1. Hartigan et al. (1994) state acc ∼ 110 × 10−7 M yr−1. We combine the mentioned values to a range of (35−115)×10−7M yr−1.

(n)

Antoniucci et al. (2008) estimate 2.2 × 10−7M yr−1 based on a substantially lower bolometric luminosity.

(o)

Yang et al. (2017) estimate 1.2 × 10−5M yr−1.

(p)

The stated accretion rate is about a factor of six lower than the value estimated by Lee et al. (2007b), who however assume a substantially lower mass for the HH 211 protostar M = 0.06 M.

(q)

The stated value lies inbetween the values estimated by Brinch et al. (2009) and Hsieh et al. (2019), that are 94 × 10−7M yr−1 and 500 × 10−7M yr−1 respectively.

(t)

Yang et al. (2017), Yıldız et al. (2015) measure 76 × 10−7M yr−1 based on CO J = 6–5 observations.

(u)

Based on CO J = 6–5 observations (Yıldız et al. 2015).

(v)

The stated value is taken from Nisini et al. (2015), Yıldız et al. (2015) measure out ∼ 200 × 10−7 M yr−1 from CO J = 6–5 observations.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.