Table 5.
Mass-loss rates of the observed targets.
Obj. | Region | θ | vt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Ṁacc(e) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(″) | (km s−1) | (10−7 M⊙ yr−1) | (10−7 M⊙ yr−1) | (10−7 M⊙ yr−1) | (10−7 M⊙ yr−1) | ||
Cep E | knot A | 25 | 95 (a) | ≲22.4−45.5 | ≲124.4−136.7 | ∼200 (j) & CO | 170 (f) |
jet | 35 | 60 (a) | ≲7.2−14.7 | ≲87.5−99.0 | |||
HH 1 | VLA 1 | 50 | 300 (b) | ≲25.9−52.6 | ≲54.9−57.8 | ∼6 (k) & [Fe II] | 290 (g) |
knot A | 20 | 400 (b) | ≲9.5−19.4 | ≲5.2−7.2 | ∼4 (k) & [S II] | ||
∼0.1 (k) & H2 | |||||||
∼15 (l) & CO | |||||||
HH 212 | knots A and B | 30 | 150 (c) | 3.9(−)7.9 | 8.0(−011.8 | ∼10 (m) & CO, SO, SiO | 80 (h) |
≤3 (n) & CO, SiO | |||||||
∼1 (o) & H2 | |||||||
L1551 | IRS 5 | 25 | 120 (d) | 5.8−11.8 | 4.9−5.4 | ≳100 (p) & CO, HCO+, swept-up gas | 30 (i) |
∼8.6 (q) & HI | |||||||
∼1.7 (r) & [Fe II] | |||||||
∼0.4 (r) & H2 |
Notes. Column 5: Derived from jet geometry (i.e. Eq. (2)). Column 6: Derived from the Hollenbach & McKee (1989) shock model, that is Eq. (3). Column 7: Mass-loss rates from the literature that are connected to other outflow components, meaning they are traced by species other than [O I] as indicated. Mass accretion rates in Col. 8 are calculated from Eq. (4) unless stated otherwise.
Proper motions from Noriega-Crespo et al. (2014).
Proper motions from Bally et al. (2002).
Proper motions from Noriega-Crespo et al. (2020).
Proper motions from Fridlund & Liseau (1994).
Calculated from their bolometric luminosities (see Sect. 4.4).
Our estimate (see Sect. 4.4). From SED modeling, Velusamy et al. (2011) estimated a surprisingly high accretion rate for Cep E-mm of the order of 10−4 M⊙ yr−1.
The stated value is in good agreement with Fischer et al. (2010). Therein, the source of the HH 1-2 outflow is labelled HOPS 203.
The stated value is in good agreement with Lee et al. (2014).
The stated value is in good agreement with, for example, Osorio et al. (2003), Liseau et al. (2005), and Gramajo et al. (2007).
Lefloch et al. (2015): This material is directly connected to the Cep E jet and not to swept-up gas.
From CO J = 1–0 observations undertaken by Tanabe et al. (2019), it is unclear if it is entrained material or not.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.