Free Access

Table 2

Position, flux densities, peak brightness temperature, and size of the sources embedded in the Main core of G31.41+0.31.

Peak position(a) Source size(b)


λ α(J2000) δ(J2000) TB Sν (b) FWHM(d) P.A. Ds (e)
(mm) h m s °′′′ (mJy beam−1) (K) (mJy) (mas) (deg) (au)
Source A

1.4 18 47 34.305 −01 12 46.07 55.6 ± 6 150 ± 15 945 ± 95 447 ± 2 × 341 ± 1 161 ± 1 1445 ± 7
3.5 18 47 34.304 −01 12 46.07 7.0 ± 0.4 206 ± 12 54 ± 3 236 ± 5 × 212 ± 4 60 ± 8 828 ± 19
7.0 18 47 34.304 −01 12 46.07 0.79 ± 0.04 227 ± 11 2.0 ± 0.10 77 ± 5 × 56 ± 4 50 ± 10 243 ± 19
13.0 18 47 34.304 −01 12 46.07 0.46 ± 0.02 225 ± 11 0.74 ± 0.04 84 ± 2 × 30 ± 2 6 ± 1 186 ± 7

Source B

1.4 18 47 34.314 −01 12 45.94 57.6 ± 6 156 ± 16 934 ± 93 465 ± 2 × 327 ± 1 83 ± 1 1443 ± 7
3.5 18 47 34.314 −01 12 45.92 6.0 ± 0.4 178 ± 11 49 ± 3 224 ± 6 × 198 ± 5 37 ± 9 780 ± 22
7.0 18 47 34.314 −01 12 45.94 0.56 ± 0.03 160 ± 8 1.2 ± 0.1 61 ± 8 × 55 ± 9 153 ± 82 215 ± 33
13.0 18 47 34.314 −01 12 45.94 0.28 ± 0.014 139 ± 7 0.40 ± 0.02 56 ± 4 × 47 ± 4 170 ± 25 190 ± 15

Source C

1.4 18 47 34.336 −01 12 45.97 37.6 ± 4 102 ± 10 464 ± 46 382 ± 3 × 292 ± 2 73 ± 1 1260 ± 11
3.5 18 47 34.334 −01 12 45.98 4.8 ± 0.3 141 ± 8 67 ± 4 306 ± 8 × 273 ± 7 37 ± 10 1069 ± 30
7.0 18 47 34.335 −01 12 45.99 0.14 ± 0.03 40 ± 7 0.6 ± 0.14 106 ± 28 × 83 ± 24 3 ± 41 347 ± 104
13.0 <0.015 <7 <0.015

Source D

1.4 18 47 34.306 −01 12 46.51 17.7 ± 2 48 ± 5 166 ± 17 323 ± 5 × 243 ± 4 173 ± 3 1036 ± 19
3.5 18 47 34.304 −01 12 46.51 3.5 ± 0.2 102 ± 6 38 ± 2 287 ± 11 × 212 ± 9 22 ± 5 912 ± 41
7.0 18 47 34.305 −01 12 46.52 0.16 ± 0.03 47 ± 7 0.7 ± 0.14 127 ± 27 × 68 ± 18 104 ± 14 344 ± 100
13.0 18 47 34.304 −01 12 46.53 0.04 ± 0.010 19 ± 2 0.04 ± 0.010 <71(f) <263 (f)

Notes. (a) Position of the dust emission peak at each wavelength estimated from the maps. (b) Estimated by fitting elliptical 2D Gaussians. (c)Peak intensity and integrated flux density corrected for primary beam response. For the peak intensity we adopted the most conservativeerror, either the uncertainty on the flux calibration or the rms noise of the map. For the integrated flux density we adopted the most conservative error, either the uncertainty on the flux calibration or the error of the 2D Gaussian fit. (d) Deconvolved Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM). (e)Deconvolved geometric mean diameter. The distance to G31 is assumed to be 3.75 kpc (Immer et al. 2019). (f) Source unresolved.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.