Open Access
Table 5
Comparison between our 1D 1σ confidence regions for the CMF and those of Barr et al. (2018).
| Planet | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Barr et al. (2018) | This study (2020) | |
| b | 0.00–0.43 | 0.12–0.41 |
| c | 0.00–0.98 | 0.16–0.32 |
| d | 0.00–0.39 | 0.24–0.58 |
| e | 0.00–0.40 | 0.32–0.57 |
| f | 0.00 | 0.24–0.58 |
| g | 0.00 | 0.26–0.54 |
| h | 0.00 | 0.15–0.53 |
Notes. We show only estimates for scenario 1, because Barr et al. (2018) did not consider any constraints on the Fe/Si ratio based on stellar composition.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.