Free Access

Table 7

Derivation of Fsync from the overshooting of 30 GHz and 44 GHz.

Data set

30 GHz 44 GHz 30 and 44 GHz
Model(a)
Model w.a.(b) 3561.7 9518.2 "
             
Lower model w.a. 3539.0 9447.1 "
             
Upper model w.a. 3577.1 9584.8 "
w.a. 24.40 20.44 "
Fit(c)
Fsync Best fit 1.50 2.53 1.58 Jy
" Random error 0.15 0.49 0.14 "
" Fit lower fη 1.15 1.97 1.22 "
" Fit upper fη 1.84 3.09 1.94 "
" Fit lower model 2.43 6.01 0.46 "
" Fit upper model 0.87 − 0.73 2.99 "

Notes. (a) Model for . The “lower model” and “upper model” labels indicate the lower and upper limits of the model. (b) “W.a.” denotes a weighted average overthe dataset. (c)The uncertainty in the best fit is divided in three components: (1) random error, (2) upper/lower limits for the effect of the uncertainty on the beam numerical efficiency correction fη, and (3) the effect of taking the upper or the lower limit for the model.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.