Open Access

Table D.1

Simulation information.

Name Total mass Sink mass Magnetization (μ) Turbulent Mach number Age
(M) (M) (kyr)
High-luminosity model I 100 4.1 5 0 39.2

High-luminosity model II 100 3.7 5 0 37.1

High-luminosity model III 60 7.4 5 0 35.6

Low-luminosity model I 30 1.3 9 2 148

Low-luminosity model II (a) 30 2.0 9 2 187

Low-luminosity model III (b) 30 0.8 9 2 153

Notes. All the simulations have a spatial resolution of a few au, and implement ambipolar diffusion. The initial density profile is ρ ∝ 1∕(1 + r2) in runs I, II, III, and is uniform in runs IV, V, and VI. For each of them we select a time step at which the simulation exhibits compact features in density similar to those that we see in the ALMA observations, i.e., bright emission from the infalling envelope, disk-like structures, and bipolar outflow cavities. (a) The sink mass is that of the largest central sink. This core is fragmenting, and thus there are several other, smaller sinks. (b) The jet is implemented by hand, with a speedof 66% of the escape speed, and an opening angle of 30°. The corresponding outflowing mass ejected by the sink is 1/3 of the mass accreted by the sink.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.