Free Access
Table 1.
Comparison of the determined parameters and those input into the simulation.
| Parameter | Simulation | Estimated | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| EM | 0.3 × 1049 cm−3 | (0.24 ± 0.02)×1049 cm−3 | X-ray flux, f_vth |
| T | 25 MK | 23.3 ± 0.1 MK | X-ray flux, f_vth |
| n | 6 × 1010 cm−3 | (4.9 ± 0.4)×1010 cm−3 | X-ray flux, f_vth (EM) and V |
| L | 24″ | 24″ | X-ray imaging |
| Ṅ | 7 × 1035 e s−1 | (7.19 ± 0.58)×1035 e s−1 | X-ray flux, f_thick_warm |
| δ | 4.6 | 4.93 ± 0.39 | X-ray flux, f_thick_warm |
| Ec | 24.0 keV | 26.6 ± 1.7 keV | X-ray flux, f_thick_warm |
| EH | 113 keV | ≈100 keV | X-ray DOP |
| Δμ | Beamed | Beamed (Δμ < 0.1) | X-ray DOP |
| λs, 0 | No turbulence | No turbulence | X-ray DOP |
Notes. We demonstrate that using the X-ray flux and DOP spectra in tandem can help us to estimate all of the acceleration parameters together and help to constrain the acceleration processes in flares.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.