Table 6.
Summary of the codes involved in the comparison.
Name | Contact | GCs | GCph | WL | XC(GCph, WL) | Curvature | Boltzmann code | External Input | Language | public |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFF | Yankelevich | ✓ | X | X | X | ✓ | X | ✓ | Fortran90 | X |
CARFISHER | Carbone | ✓ | X | X | X | ✓ | CAMB | ✓ | IDL | X |
FISHERMATHICA | Casas | ✓ | ![]() |
✓ | ![]() |
✓ | CAMB | ✓ | Mathematica | ![]() |
CLASS | ||||||||||
MGCAMB | ||||||||||
FISHMATH | Majerotto | ✓ | X | X | X | ✓ | X | ✓ | Mathematica | X |
SOAPFISH | Sapone | ✓ | X | X | X | ✓ | X | ✓ | Mathematica | ![]() |
Python3 | ||||||||||
TOTALLYSAF | Tutusaus | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | CAMB | ✓ | Python2/3 | ![]() |
Yahia-Cherif | CLASS | C++ | ||||||||
CCCP | Camera | X | ✓ | ✓ | ![]() |
✓ | X | ✓ | Mathematica | X |
CCCPy | Camera | X | ![]() |
✓ | ![]() |
![]() |
CLASS | ✓ | Python | ![]() |
CAMB | ||||||||||
COSMICFISH | Martinelli | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | CAMB | X | Fortran90 | X |
Raveri | EFTCAMB | Python2.7 | ||||||||
MGCAMB | ||||||||||
COSMOSIS | Kilbinger | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ![]() |
CAMB | ![]() |
Fortran90 | ✓ |
Tutusaus | CLASS | C / C++ | ||||||||
MGCAMB | Python | |||||||||
STAFF | Cardone | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | Mathematica | X |
Notes. The table reports, for each code involved in the comparison, the contact person(s), the available probes, the capability of the code to consider spatially non-flat models, the interfaced Boltzmann solver(s), the possibility to work with external input, the code’s language, and whether or not the validated version of the code is publicly available at the time of the release of this paper. Four codes (FisherMathica, SOAPFish, CCCPy, TotallySAF) are planned to be made publicly available, while five codes (BFF, fishMath, CosmicFish, CarFisher and STAFF) can be available upon request. Requests can be made directly to the authors, as listed in this Table. For the comparison performed here, we rely on common input cosmological quantities for all the forecast codes except for CosmicFish and CosmoSIS; for these two codes we do not use the common input, but rather exploit their interface with a version of CAMB compatible with the one used to generate it. The orange crosses stand for features of the codes that are implemented but have not been validated in this work.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.