Free Access
Table 1
Best-fit parameters for the cutoffpl model.
| NH |  |
| aFe(a) | 1.07 ± 0.03 |
| Γ | 0.30 ± 0.11 |
| Efold |  |
| F3−50 keV (b) |  |
| AFe Kα (c) |  |
| AFe Kβ (c) |  |
| ANi Kα (c) |  |
| fCS | 0.11 ± 0.04 |
| cFPMA (d) | 1 |
| cFPMB (d) | 1.036 ± 0.011 |
| cEPIC-pn (d) | 0.908 ± 0.017 |
| cEPIC-MOS1 (d) | 0.94 ± 0.04 |
| cEPIC-MOS2 (d) | 0.93 ± 0.04 |
| EGFPMA (e) | − 25 ± 9 eV |
| EGFPMB (e) | − 67 ± 9 eV |
| EGEPIC-pn (e) |  |
| EGEPIC-MOS1 (e) |  |
| EGEPIC-MOS2 (e) | 7 ± 4 eV |
 |
1.20 (864) |
Notes. (a) Relative iron abundance compared to Asplund et al. (2009). (b)Unabsorbed 3–50 keV flux. (c)Absorbed line flux. (d) Detector cross-calibration constant with respect to FPMA. (e)Additive gain shift relative to the energy grid defined by the RMF.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.