Table 5.
Average offset and spread of adopted effective temperatures compared to the literature values, where ΔTeff = Teff, lit − Teff, SP_Ace/ATHOS.
| Study | Galaxy | Method Tlit | ⟨ΔTeff⟩ATHOS | σ(ΔTeff)ATHOS | # ATHOS | ⟨ΔTeff⟩SP_Ace | σ(ΔTeff)SP_Ace | # SP_Ace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Letarte et al. (2010) | For | Phot | 261 | – | 1 | −99 | 51 | 72 |
| Kirby et al. (2010) | For | Fit/Spec | – | – | – | −87 | 65 | 16 |
| Kirby et al. (2013) | For | Fit/Spec | – | – | – | −217 | 73 | 20 |
| Lemasle et al. (2014) | For | Phot | 68 | 56 | 2 | −235 | 66 | 36 |
| Skúladóttir et al. (2015) | Scl | Phot | −57 | 163 | 7 | −157 | 82 | 72 |
| Hill et al. (2019) | Scl | Phot | −57 | 163 | 7 | −158 | 79 | 71 |
| Geisler et al. (2005) | Scl | Phot | – | – | – | −191 | 74 | 2 |
| Simon et al. (2015) | Scl | Spec | 3 | – | 1 | – | – | – |
| Kirby et al. (2010) | Scl | Fit/Spec | −45 | – | 1 | −100 | 87 | 6 |
| Kirby et al. (2013) | Scl | Fit/Spec | −41 | 80 | 4 | −100 | 226 | 44 |
| Kirby et al. (2010) | Sex | Fit/Spec | – | – | – | −172 | – | 1 |
| Kirby et al. (2013) | Sex | Fit/Spec | 205 | 249 | 7 | 58 | 251 | 18 |
| Shetrone et al. (2001) | Sex | Spec | – | – | – | −172 | – | 1 |
| Sbordone et al. (2007) | Sgr | Phot | – | – | – | −96 | 114 | 12 |
| Hansen et al. (2018) | Sgr | Spec | −89 | 367 | 2 | −130 | 81 | 11 |
| Bonifacio et al. (2004) | Sgr | Phot | – | – | – | 26 | 66 | 9 |
| Koch et al. (2008) | Car | Phot | – | – | – | −167 | – | 1 |
| Norris et al. (2017) | Car | Phot | −50 | – | 1 | −61 | 115 | 9 |
| Fabrizio et al. (2012) | Car | Phot | −110 | – | 1 | −78 | 119 | 17 |
| Lemasle et al. (2012) | Car | Phot | 174 | 341 | 4 | −112 | 150 | 29 |
| Ural et al. (2015) | UMi | Spec | 129 | – | 1 | −23 | 21 | 2 |
| All studies | – | – | 132 | 260 | 62 | −119 | 137 | 462 |
Notes. “Method Tlit” indicates the method used in the literature to determine the effective temperature: photometrically (Phot), spectoscopically (Spec), or with fits over spectral regions (Fit).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.