Table 7.
Weak lensing constraints derived for the fit range 0.2 Mpc < r < 1.5 Mpc.
Using c(M) from D19 |
Using ![]() |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster | M200c | M500c | ![]() |
M200c | M500c | M500c, YX |
SPT-CLJ 0000−5748 |
![]() |
![]() |
3.72 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
SPT-CLJ 2043−5035 |
![]() |
![]() |
3.66 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
SPT-CLJ 2331−5051 |
![]() |
![]() |
3.69 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Notes. Masses are in 1014 M⊙ and are reported for two different over-densities Δ ∈ {200c, 500c}. For comparison we also list Chandra X-ray mass estimates M500c, YX from McDonald et al. (2019). Column 1: cluster designation. Column 2: M200c constraints obtained when assuming the c(M) relation from D19. Column 3: M500c constraints obtained when assuming the c(M) relation from D19. Column 4: concentration derived from the D19 c(M) relation for the best-fit M200c. Column 5: M200c constraints obtained for a fixed concentration . Column 6: M500c constraints obtained for a fixed concentration
. The statistical uncertainties listed for the mass constraints correspond to shape noise (asymmetric), uncorrelated large-scale structure projections, and line-of-sight variations in the source redshift distribution. The systematic mass uncertainty amounts to 7.4%. Column 7: Chandra X-ray mass estimates computed by McDonald et al. (2019) assuming the YX–M scaling relation from Vikhlinin et al. (2009).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.