Table 2.
Results of the polarized intensity study of detected double-lobed sources.
GRG | RA | Dec | P | σQU | p | RM | ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(deg) | (deg) | (mJy) | (mJy beam−1) | (%) | (rad m−2) | ||
0a | 151.228 | 35.026 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 11.7 ± 0.5 | 3.23 ± 0.02 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
0b | 151.918 | 34.687 | 26.2 | 0.3 | 5.40 ± 0.06 | 9.071 ± 0.006 | 0.126 ± 0.007 |
1a | 164.276 | 53.430 | 44.0 | 0.2 | 5.28 ± 0.02 | 12.855 ± 0.002 | 0.83 ± 0.02 |
1b | 164.264 | 53.448 | 4.69 | 0.08 | 2.57 ± 0.05 | 12.20 ± 0.01 | 0.167 ± 0.008 |
2a | 164.257 | 48.613 | 14.83 | 0.09 | 8.56 ± 0.05 | 16.940 ± 0.003 | 0.70 ± 0.02 |
2b | 164.339 | 48.725 | 1.23 | 0.07 | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 19.01 ± 0.04 | 0.072 ± 0.007 |
19a | 167.363 | 53.255 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 11.18 ± 0.06 | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
19b | 167.422 | 53.211 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.75 ± 0.09 | 11.39 ± 0.07 | 0.088 ± 0.007 |
22a | 168.399 | 46.381 | 0.87 | 0.09 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 4.04 ± 0.06 | |
22b | 168.381 | 46.364 | 0.48 | 0.07 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 4.57 ± 0.09 | |
51a | 180.311 | 49.384 | 0.96 | 0.09 | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 22.03 ± 0.05 | 0.13 ± 0.04 |
51b | 180.380 | 49.458 | 3.1 | 0.1 | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 22.70 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.09 |
64a | 184.574 | 53.441 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 15.30 ± 0.03 | 0.062 ± 0.007 |
64b | 184.569 | 53.477 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 1.28 ± 0.07 | 14.57 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.07 |
65a | 184.659 | 50.431 | 33.6 | 0.2 | 3.21 ± 0.02 | 27.784 ± 0.003 | 0.72 ± 0.02 |
65b | 184.742 | 50.445 | 17.0 | 0.1 | 3.00 ± 0.02 | 26.682 ± 0.005 | 0.43 ± 0.01 |
77a | 186.468 | 53.153 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.73 ± 0.09 | 13.10 ± 0.08 | 0.07 ± 0.02 |
77b | 186.514 | 53.168 | 1.25 | 0.09 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 11.90 ± 0.04 | |
85a | 188.648 | 53.376 | 5.95 | 0.1 | 4.41 ± 0.09 | 7.51 ± 0.01 | 0.64 ± 0.07 |
85b | 188.853 | 53.247 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.4 | 10.08 ± 0.06 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
87a | 189.208 | 46.064 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 21.44 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.03 |
87b | 189.190 | 46.083 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 16.92 ± 0.08 | 0.08 ± 0.02 |
91a | 190.090 | 53.581 | 11.2 | 0.1 | 2.86 ± 0.03 | 17.952 ± 0.006 | 0.185 ± 0.006 |
91b | 190.027 | 53.573 | 10.35 | 0.09 | 3.02 ± 0.03 | 19.353 ± 0.005 | 0.88 ± 0.09 |
103a | 195.379 | 54.130 | 4.53 | 0.07 | 1.28 ± 0.02 | 13.676 ± 0.009 | 0.097 ± 0.002 |
103b | 195.441 | 54.145 | 13.85 | 0.09 | 1.71 ± 0.01 | 14.017 ± 0.004 | 0.61 ± 0.03 |
120a | 200.110 | 49.284 | 0.61 | 0.07 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 10.85 ± 0.06 | |
120b | 200.127 | 49.277 | 0.48 | 0.06 | 6.9 ± 0.9 | 10.90 ± 0.08 | |
144a | 204.835 | 50.982 | 0.93 | 0.09 | 8.4 ± 0.8 | 9.05 ± 0.06 | |
144b | 204.847 | 50.937 | 0.57 | 0.08 | 4.3 ± 0.6 | 8.22 ± 0.08 | |
145a | 205.259 | 49.278 | 3.18 | 0.07 | 2.33 ± 0.05 | 10.52 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.02 |
145b | 205.266 | 49.258 | 5.27 | 0.07 | 6.68 ± 0.09 | 10.002 ± 0.008 | 0.71 ± 0.06 |
165a | 210.762 | 51.456 | 2.91 | 0.07 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 19.41 ± 0.01 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
165b | 210.714 | 51.458 | 0.97 | 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.07 | 17.62 ± 0.04 | 0.4 ± 0.1 |
166a | 210.770 | 51.749 | 1.47 | 0.07 | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 11.38 ± 0.03 | 0.096 ± 0.007 |
166b | 210.851 | 51.744 | 1.48 | 0.07 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 12.87 ± 0.03 | 0.25 ± 0.03 |
168a | 211.414 | 54.197 | 7.6 | 0.09 | 8.9 ± 0.1 | 14.998 ± 0.007 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
168b | 211.428 | 54.173 | 0.84 | 0.07 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 13.34 ± 0.05 | 0.13 ± 0.03 |
177a | 213.511 | 48.707 | 2.14 | 0.07 | 0.79 ± 0.02 | 19.94 ± 0.02 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
177b | 213.545 | 48.694 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 19.18 ± 0.08 | 0.31 ± 0.07 |
222a | 222.690 | 53.000 | 4.86 | 0.09 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 16.91 ± 0.01 | 0.45 ± 0.07 |
222b | 222.761 | 53.005 | 1.35 | 0.08 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 15.19 ± 0.04 | 0.12 ± 0.02 |
233a | 226.152 | 50.501 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 6.16 ± 0.03 | 0.044 ± 0.003 |
233b | 226.225 | 50.505 | 2.4 | 0.2 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 5.71 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.04 |
Notes. Column 1: as in Table 1 with a letter to distinguish the two lobes; Cols. 2 and 3: J2000 celestial coordinates of the highest signal-to-noise pixel; Col. 4: polarized flux density of the detected source component; Col. 5: polarization noise derived from the Faraday Q and U spectra; Col. 6: fractional polarization at the position of the most significant pixel. The uncertainty was derived from the propagation of the root mean square noise in the polarized and total intensity images; Col. 7: Faraday rotation derived from the main peak of the Faraday spectrum of the most significant pixel. The uncertainty was computed as the resolution of the Faraday spectrum divided by two times the signal-to-noise ratio of the detection. This does not include the systematic error from the ionospheric RM correction (on the order of ∼0.1 rad m−2, Van Eck et al. 2018); Col. 8: depolarization factor. The uncertainties were derived with standard propagation from the root mean square noise of the images. The values reported in Cols. 2–7 were derived from the 20″ images, while the depolarization factor in Col. 8 was obtained using 45″ resolution images.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.