Table 1.
Fifteen loop oscillation events chosen for analysis.
| Event ID | Loop ID | Length | Period | Damping time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Mm) | (min) | (min) | ||
| 3 | 1 | 213 | 2.2 | 4.7 |
| 5 | 1 | 438 | 8.6 | 11.2 |
| 19 | 1 | 499 | 16.8 | 26.1 |
| 22 | 1 | 432 | 18.4 | 31.1 |
| 27 | 1 | 162 | 7.6 | 19.6 |
| 28 | 1 | 234 | 4.0 | 8.1 |
| 29 | 2 | 407 | 8.5 | 22* |
| 36 | 2 | 347 | 6.7 | 10.1 |
| 36 | 10 | 238 | 6.0 | 10.7 |
| 37 | 4 | 222 | 4.8 | 8.4 |
| 63 | 2 | 183 | 6.0 | 24.4* |
| 64 | 6 | 431 | 20.8 | 25.9 |
| 72 | 3 | 124 | 6.6 | 30.3* |
| 90 | 1 | 254 | 10.5 | 29* |
| 93 | 1 | 326 | 8.2 | 13.7 |
Notes. The first two columns refer to the event and loop IDs given in Nechaeva et al. (2019), and the loop length is taken from the catalogue. The period and damping time are determined by the same method as in Goddard et al. (2016), using the present data. Events with asterisks note cases where temporal windows of just one damping time were used in the further analysis.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.