Free Access

Table 2

Results from the occultation fitting of SAGE models.

Number Name Pole Year of occultation Diameter (km) + σD (km) σD (km)
3 Juno 1979-12-11 260.0 13.0 −12.0
2000-05-24 236.0 20.0 −17.0
2014-11-20 250.0 12.0 −11.0
             
14 Irene 1 2013-08-02 145.8 12.0 −11.5
2 2013-08-02 145.2 91.5 −18.1
             
20 Massalia 1 2012-10-09 106.5 4.8 −2.8
2 2012-10-09 113.5 6.2 −9.9
             
64 Angelina 1 2004-07-03 48.9 3.8 −2.3
2 2004-07-03 50.7 2.1 −3.0
             
68 Leto 1 1999-05-23 152.0 20.8 −18.3
2 1999-05-23 132.8 8.4 −8.0
             
89 Julia 2005-08-13 138.7 14.2 −6.4
2006-12-04 137.3 2.1 −4.5
             
145 Adeona 2005-02-02 145 4.3 −2.7
             
308 Polyxo 1 2000-01-10 133.5 5.8 −6.3
2004-11-16 125.4 11.1 −8.6
2010-06-02 128.8 3.0 −2.8
2 2000-01-10 131.2 5.0 −2.9
2004-11-16 125.3 10.7 −8.1
2010-06-02 127.8 3.5 −4.3
             
381 Myrrha 1991-01-13 134.8 45.3 −12.8
             
441 Bathilde 1 2003-01-11 75.3 74.6 −10.0
2 2003-01-11 76.8 15.9 −9.1

Notes. Mirror pole solutions are labeled “pole 1” and “pole 2”. Scaled sizes are given in kilometers as the diameters of the equivalent volume spheres.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.