Fig. 8.

Comparison of the polarization fraction computed through the GK method (solid line) and the radiation anisotropy method we employ in this paper (dotted line). For more details on the simulation parameters, see Goldreich & Kylafis (1981). We consider a J = 1 − 0 transition at 100 GHz, with a strong magnetic field along the -axis and a velocity gradient of 10−9 s−1 in the xy-plane. We consider a temperature of T = 10 K. Three ratios for the collision-radiative rates are considered and denoted inside the figure. The polarization fraction was computed for a ray traveling along the
-axis.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.