Table B.3.
Periods appearing in the ℓ1 periodogram of the model with the highest approximated evidence and their false alarm probabilities.
| Period (d) | FAP (best fit) | Inclusion in the model | E20 median FAP |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.839 | 1.00 | 0.714% | – |
| 2.178 | 1.83 × 10−3 | 9.486% | – |
| 3.432 | 5.78 × 10−12 | 100.0% | 1.98 × 10−8 |
| 5.197 | 7.49 × 10−8 | 100.0% | 1.23 × 10−5 |
| 7.953 | 8.67 × 10−7 | 100.0% | 3.15 × 10−5 |
| 12.03 | 1.38 × 10−4 | 90.38% | 4.35 × 10−3 |
| 17.4 | 1.00 | 38.07% | – |
| 17.74 | 4.81 × 10−3 | 8.771% | – |
| 34.59 | 1.00 | 0.0% | – |
| 365.7 | 1.00 | 56.07% | – |
| 640.0 | 1.00 | 8.966% | – |
| 1920. | 1.00 | 39.44% | – |
Notes. Third columns: percentage of models in the 20% best evidence (E20 noise models) where the periodicity has a FAP < 0.05, and the fourth column shows the median FAP of these periodicities in the E20 models.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.