Table A.1.
Comparison between the breakout time, cocoon energy and breakout radius predictions of our model and those found in numerical simulations of Gottlieb et al. (2018a) and Nagakura et al. (2014).
| Gottlieb et al. (2018a) | tbo [s] | Ec [1049 erg] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configuration | Sim. | Model | Sim. | Model |
| A | 0.10 | 0.10 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| B | 0.20 | 0.18 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| C | 0.12 | 0.14 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| Nagakura et al. (2014) | tbo [s] | rbo [109 cm] | ||
| Configuration | Sim. | Model | Sim. | Model |
| M-ref | 0.23 | 0.24 | 3.7 | 3.5 |
| M-L4 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
| M-th30 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 8.9 | 7.2 |
| M-th45 | – | 1.01 | – | 13 |
| M-ti500 | 0.90 | 0.69 | 17.5 | 14 |
| M-M3 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 2.0 | 1.7 |
| M-M2-2 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 5.0 | 4.4 |
| M-M1 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 11.0 | 8.2 |
Notes. The energies reported in Gottlieb et al. (2018a) refer to both the jet and the counter-jet cocoons, so they have been divided by 2.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.