Table 2.
Simulated brightness temperatures in ALMA Band 3 after applying different synthetic beams in comparison to the ALMA observations.
| Beam |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantity | All | NW | IN | Maj | Min | Ang |
| Original model | ||||||
| Tb, avg. [K] | 7015 | 7977 | 6688 | – | – | – |
| Tb, rms [K] | 1549 | 1794 | 1304 | |||
| Convolved with representative ALMA beam, this work. | ||||||
| Tb, avg. [K] | 7015 | 7969 | 6691 | 2.10″ | 1.37″ | 68.0° |
| Tb, rms [K] | 1033 | 1254 | 693 | |||
| Convolved with ALMA beam by Loukitcheva et al. (2019). | ||||||
| Tb, avg. [K] | 7015 | 7971 | 6690 | 1.6″ | 1.6″ | – |
| Tb, rms [K] | 1056 | 1279 | 722 | |||
| Convolved with ALMA beam by Nindos et al. (2018). | ||||||
| Tb, avg. [K] | 7015 | 7865 | 6726 | 8.1″ | 2.3″ | −48° |
| Tb, rms [K] | 744 | 802 | 431 | |||
| Convolved with BIMA beam by White et al. (2006). | ||||||
| Tb, avg. [K] | 7016 | 7681 | 6790 | 10.0″ | 10.0″ | – |
| Tb, rms [K] | 536 | 495 | 317 | |||
| ALMA observations, this work. | ||||||
| Tb, avg. [K] | 7400 | 7588 | 7228 | 2.10″ | 1.37″ | 68.0° |
| Tb, rms [K] | 453 | 478 | 342 | |||
Notes. The average and standard deviation (rms) are given for all pixels and separately for network (NW) and internetwork (IN) pixels. The major and minor axes (and if applicable the angle) of the applied beam are stated for each case.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.