Free Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936980e]


Table 1.

Summary of bias changes for the different case studies.

Statistics
90% Confidence interval
Effect(s) (b/σ)w0 (b/σ)wa (b/σ)w0 (b/σ)wa
PSF 0.006 ± 0.002(0.029) −0.018 ± 0.005(0.064) (−0.024, 0.033) (−0.042, 0.015)
CTI (reset off) −0.045 ± 0.030(0.370) 0.045 ± 0.027(0.330) (−0.328, 0.077) (−0.054, 0.281)
CTI (reset on) −0.049 ± 0.007(0.083) −0.038 ± 0.006(0.068) (−0.078, 0.152) (−0.121, 0.067)
PSF & CTI (reset on) 0.056 ± 0.006(0.078) −0.050 ± 0.005(0.066) (−0.046, 0.144) (−0.124, 0.032)

Notes. The column labelled “Statistics” shows the mean and 68% error on the mean for our 150 realisations. The numbers in brackets are the standard deviation of the distributions. The column labelled “90% Confidence interval” shows the 90% confidence regions in our distributions.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.