Erratum for: A&A, 622, A130 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834461

The original article presented the density scaling relation (Eq. (2)) incorrectly. The correct relation is:

(2)

This error affects the rightmost panel of Fig. 10, the bottom left panel of Fig. 13, and the bottom left panel of Fig. 14. The corrected panels are presented in Figs. 1 and 2.

Fig. 1. Corrected rightmost panel of Fig. 10. The biases in the residuals are consistent with zero (−0.004 ± 0.017 ρ ⊙).

Fig. 2. Corrected bottom left panels of Figs. 13 and 14. The dashed lines corresponding to the scaling relations have been removed.

The sentence “We note that the large number of outliers in mean density estimates in Fig. 10 arise mainly from their very small uncertainties”. is no longer relevant, as the majority of these are no longer outliers with the correct relation.

© ESO 2020

All Figures

	Fig. 1. Corrected rightmost panel of Fig. 10. The biases in the residuals are consistent with zero (−0.004 ± 0.017 ρ ⊙).
In the text

	Fig. 2. Corrected bottom left panels of Figs. 13 and 14. The dashed lines corresponding to the scaling relations have been removed.
In the text