Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for: [this article]

Issue
A&A
Volume 635, March 2020
Article Number C2
Number of page(s) 1
Section Stellar structure and evolution
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834461e
Published online 03 March 2020

The original article presented the density scaling relation (Eq. (2)) incorrectly. The correct relation is:

(2)

This error affects the rightmost panel of Fig. 10, the bottom left panel of Fig. 13, and the bottom left panel of Fig. 14. The corrected panels are presented in Figs. 1 and 2.

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Corrected rightmost panel of Fig. 10. The biases in the residuals are consistent with zero (−0.004 ± 0.017 ρ ).

Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 2.

Corrected bottom left panels of Figs. 13 and 14. The dashed lines corresponding to the scaling relations have been removed.

Open with DEXTER

The sentence “We note that the large number of outliers in mean density estimates in Fig. 10 arise mainly from their very small uncertainties”. is no longer relevant, as the majority of these are no longer outliers with the correct relation.


© ESO 2020

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1.

Corrected rightmost panel of Fig. 10. The biases in the residuals are consistent with zero (−0.004 ± 0.017 ρ ).

Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2.

Corrected bottom left panels of Figs. 13 and 14. The dashed lines corresponding to the scaling relations have been removed.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.