Free Access
Table 5
Comparison of the different models.
| Model |  |
 |
Strength of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isothermal | 726.92 ± 0.14 | – | – |
| T gradient | 726.31 ± 0.13 | − 0.31 | No evidence |
| Isothermal with day-to-night side wind | 729.24 ± 0.17 | 2.93 | Moderate evidence |
| Isothermal with super-rotational wind | 729.13 ± 0.17 | 2.82 | Moderate evidence |
| Isothermal with vertical wind | 739.79 ± 0.17 | 12.87 | Strong evidence |
| Isothermal with day-to-night side lower and vertical higher wind | 739.95 ± 0.2 | 13.0 | Strong evidence |
| Isothermal with no lower and vertical higher wind | 740.15 ± 0.13 | 13.20 | Strong evidence |
| Isothermal with super-rotational lower and vertical higher wind | 740.21 ± 0.2 | 13.26 | Strong evidence |
Notes. The base model to calculate 
is the isothermal model with no added wind patterns. The comparison stems from the Jeffrey’s scale in Table 1.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.