Fig. 2.

Sample inversion outputs from NICOLE and SIR. Panel a: MBP of interest that was inverted with both codes. The MBP is roughly central within the field-of-view, with an MBP of lower intensity also visible near the bottom of the image. Panel b: LOS magnetic field and LOS velocity obtained with NICOLE and SIR, respectively. These are displayed for the log τ = −1 level of the atmosphere. The inversion outputs are consistent across both methods. Panel c: fits to Stokes I (left) and Stokes V (right). The fits are shown for a single pixel within the center of the MBP seen in the center of the FOV in panel a. The black lines are the observed Stokes profile for this pixel, while the red dashed lines are the synthetic profiles after inversion. The obtained fits for both methods are fairly accurate, and given the results are consistent across both methods, we have confidence in the output models from the inversion codes.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.