Free Access

Table 2.

Additional properties of the best-fit models with their uncertainties.

Area Projected width Rel. position npart ρ i(H)
[km] [cm−3] [g cm−3]
f1 1500–1600 0.02–0.12 2.10 × 1011 ± 45% 3.26 × 10−13 ± 51% 0.57 ± 30% 2.54 ± 16%
f2 1700–1750 0.01–0.07 1.52 × 1011 ± 50% 2.45 × 10−13 ± 49% 0.41 ± 5% 2.02 ± 5%
f3 1400–2550 0.01–0.07 4.32 × 1011 ± 65% 8.46 × 10−13 ± 68% 0.15 ± 47% 1.05 ± 35%
f4 1500–1650 0.03–0.25 1.00 × 1011 ± 51% 1.36 × 10−13 ± 51% 0.80 ± 11% 3.88 ± 17%
f5 1750–2200 0.03–0.15 1.00 × 1011 ± 51% 1.36 × 10−13 ± 50% 0.75 ± 3% 3.01 ± 12%
f6 2150–1240 0.03–0.27 8.40 × 1010 ± 51% 1.07 × 10−13 ± 51% 0.91 ± 3% 3.89 ± 13%

Notes. The table lists: width of the projected slab, relative position – the best-fit LOS position relative to whole width of the projected slab (equal to zero at its south end and to 1 at its north end), particle density, plasma density, ionisation degree of hydrogen, and the optical thickness in the Hα centre at the best-fit LOS position.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.