Fig. 4.

Comparison between the different projections of the interior fields obtained using Tóth & Roe’s operator (blue) and the nonlinear operator here derived (red), from the same exterior fluxes (black) and for a cubic cell. Each panel corresponds to a slice of a coarse cell, for which the indices of the fine cells are given at the upper left (cf. Fig. 3). The direction of the original flux is better preserved by the nonlinear operator (cf. right panels), where a component in the y-direction that was not originally present appears for the Tóth & Roe operator. The field interpolated using the nonlinear operator is exactly zero for cells with j = −1. For clarity, vectors in the lower left panel are represented with a double size.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.