Table 4
Comparison between TTV inducing frequencies calculated from periods of the system solution to measured TTV frequencies by Ofir et al. (2018).
| Planets | fcalc (10−4 d−1) | TTV matching | fOfir (10−4 d−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super frequencies | |||
| b and c | 9.86 ± 0.22 | Main peak in b |  |
| b and f | 18.06 ± 0.33 | One peak in c | 17.9 ± 3.2 |
| c and f | 8.18 ± 0.26 | Main peak in c | 8.15 ± 0.12 |
| Chopping frequencies | |||
| b and c | 184.2 ± 3.1 | No matching peak | |
| b and f | 246.1 ± 4.1 | No matching peak | |
| c and f | 61.9 ± 1.0 | One peak in c | 58.9 ± 3.2 |
| Orbital frequencies | |||
| b | 378.2 ± 6.3 | No matching peak | |
| c | 194.0 ± 3.2 | No matching peak | |
| f | 132.1 ± 2.2 | No matching peak | |
Notes. Super, chopping, and orbital frequencies are given; from left to right the table shows the considered planets, the computed frequency, a match in the Ofir et al. (2018) results (if any), and the matching frequency.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.