Press Release
Open Access

Table 1.

Characterization and validation of the 17 new planets from our TLS search, MCMC fitting, and vespa false-positive vetting pipeline.

EPIC K2 name Ms (M) P (d) Rp/Rs Rp (R) b #tr (b) SNR SDETLS ρ(″) FPP FPP2
201238110.02(d) 3 12.1 27.5 1.0 5.3 × 10−4 2.1 × 10−5
201497682.03(d) 36 9.5 21.2 22.3 5.0 × 10−2 2.1 × 10−3
201615463.02(i) K2-166 15 8.0 17.7 24.1 1.7 × 10−2 6.8 × 10−4
201754305.03(cde) K2-16 26 9.6 22.9 0.5 3.2 × 10−5 1.3 × 10−6
201833600.02(de) K2-50 18 8.0 12.7 10.0 8.3 × 10−3 3.3 × 10−4
201841433.02(d) 18 7.3 19.1 1.0 3.8 × 10−3 1.5 × 10−4
205950854.02(di) K2-168 9 10.0 21.3 1.0 2.9 × 10−3 1.2 × 10−4
206024342.03(de) 13 11.3 25.1 27.0 2.4 × 10−2 9.7 × 10−4
206032309.02(d) 24 11.9 20.7 1.0 8.1 × 10−3 3.3 × 10−4
206042996.02(d) 12 9.7 19.7 1.0 8.4 × 10−4 3.4 × 10−5
206215704.02(d) 29 12.4 22.5 1.0 1.1 × 10−1 5.0 × 10−3
206317286.02(d) 42 10.2 25.2 1.0 1.1 × 10−2 4.6 × 10−4
212297394.02(g) 33 11.1 24.2 1.0 4.4 × 10−3 1.8 × 10−4
212424622.02(g) 4 8.5 19.0 1.0 2.2 × 10−2 9.2 × 10−4
212499991.02(g) 2 9.1 11.9 11.1 2.0 × 10−1 9.9 × 10−3
212587672.02(fgk) 5 8.6 18.5 23.5 1.3 × 10−1 6.1 × 10−3
220554210.02(dk) K2-282 103 16.8 25.8 1.0 4.0 × 10−5 1.6 × 10−6

Notes. T0, P, Rp/Rs, and b obtained from MCMC fitting. #tr, S/N, and SDETLS obtained from TLS. FPP2 obtained with vespa and corrected for the multiplicity boost following Eq. (1). Rp [R] derived from Rp/Rs as per TLS and literature values for the stellar radius. All stellar radii and masses from Huber et al. (2016), except for EPIC 201497682(l), EPIC 201615463(j), EPIC 201754305(d), EPIC 201841433(l), EPIC 205950854(j), EPIC 212297394(l), EPIC 212499991(l), EPIC 212587672(k), and EPIC 220554210(k). (a)T0 = BKJD − 2065 d with the Barycentric Kepler Julian Day BKJD = BJD − 2, 454, 833.0 d. (b)Number of transits detected with TLS that have data.

References. Planets or candidates have previously been found in these systems by (c) Montet et al. (2015), (d) Vanderburg et al. (2016), (e) Crossfield et al. (2016), (f) Barros et al. (2016), (g) Pope et al. (2016), (h) Dressing et al. (2017), (i) Mayo et al. (2018), (j) Livingston et al. (2018b), (k) Petigura et al. (2018). Gaia DR2 radii were computed by (l) Andrae et al. (2018).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.