Table 6.
Best solutions obtained for different MCMC runs.
| MCMC run | Ω/ΩK | i (in °) | f (in d−1) | R (in R⊙) | M (in M⊙) |
 |
 |
 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| True seismic | 0.3903 | 45.3 | 0.96960 | 1.638 | 1.718 | 467.8 | 2615 | 3.0 × 106 |
| 0.3903 ± 0.0002 | 45.3 ± 0.2 | 0.96960 ± 0.00005 | 1.638 ± 0.006 | 1.719 ± 0.020 | ||||
| 0.2732 ± 0.0001 | 86.1 ± 1.3 | 0.92894 ± 0.00006 | 1.652 ± 0.002 | 1.793 ± 0.007 | ||||
| σF = 0.01 | 0.3977 | 42.9 | 1.0241 | 1.595 | 1.755 | 468.8 | 1017 | 1.2 × 107 |
| 0.3977 ± 0.0002 | 42.9 ± 0.5 | 1.0241 ± 0.0001 | 1.595 ± 0.015 | 1.756 ± 0.049 | ||||
| σF = 0.05 | 0.2625 | 80.4 | 1.0656 | 1.505 | 1.800 | 412.7 | 2257 | 7.8 × 107 |
| 0.2624 ± 0.0011 | 82.3 ± 3.7 | 1.0656 ± 0.0004 | 1.501 ± 0.011 | 1.786 ± 0.041 | ||||
| σF = 0.05 (2017/18) | 0.2599 | 86.0 | 1.0630 | 1.505 | 1.794 | 508.8 | 2017 | 2.8 × 107 |
| 0.2601 ± 0.0011 | 84.8 ± 3.2 | 1.0630 ± 0.0005 | 1.509 ± 0.009 | 1.809 ± 0.032 | ||||
| σF = 0.05 (even) | 0.2742 | 76.5 | 0.9978 | 1.570 | 1.776 | 449.1 | 4723 | 1.3 × 108 |
| 0.2736 ± 0.0015 | 78.6 ± 3.6 | 0.9976 ± 0.0003 | 1.565 ± 0.015 | 1.758 ± 0.052 | ||||
| σF = 0.05 (even, 2017/18) | 0.2799 | 79.8 | 0.9298 | 1.636 | 1.737 | 528.9 | 7211 | 9.0 × 107 |
| 0.2801 ± 0.0013 | 81.5 ± 3.6 | 0.9298 ± 0.0005 | 1.631 ± 0.012 | 1.720 ± 0.039 | ||||
| σF = 0.1 (even) | 0.2723 | 89.9 | 0.9258 | 1.658 | 1.802 | 412.3 | 6559 | 6.5 × 107 |
| 0.2735 ± 0.0007 | 87.8 ± 1.6 | 0.9262 ± 0.0004 | 1.653 ± 0.004 | 1.785 ± 0.013 | ||||
| σF = 0.1 (even, 2017/18) | 0.2723 | 89.2 | 0.9258 | 1.658 | 1.802 | 515.9 | 8049 | 6.2 × 107 |
| 0.2735 ± 0.0007 | 87.6 ± 1.6 | 0.9262 ± 0.0004 | 1.653 ± 0.004 | 1.785 ± 0.013 |
Notes. Two lines are provided for each configuration, except for the first configuration. The upper line shows the best solution (i.e., the solution that minimizes the cost function). The 
values given in the penultimate column have all been calculated using a frequency tolerance σF = 0.01 d−1 even if the MCMC run may have used a different value of σF. The second line gives the statistical averages and standard deviations of all of the solutions with the same mode identification as the best solution. These uncertainties therefore do not account for the dispersion resulting from other identifications, or from systematic effects that may occur as a result of limitations in the models. The third line for the first configuration corresponds to a near equator-on set of secondary solutions obtained for the first MCMC run.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.