Notes. Column 1: galaxy name. Column 2: morphological type (de Vaucouleurs et al. 1991). NGC 584 had been misclassified in the earlier work and we adopt the classification by Huang et al. (2013) in this work. Column 3: distance to the galaxy (taken from Cappellari et al. 2011 for SAURON/ATLAS^3D galaxies or NED for VIMOS and MUSE galaxies); the uncertainties were calculated by dividing the NED standard deviations by , where N is the number of measurements. Column 4: linear scale derived from the distance. Column 5: 2MASS total K-band magnitude (Jarrett et al. 2000). Column 6: effective radius derived from B-band (CGS) or r-band (ATLAS^3D) imaging data. The values were taken from Ho et al. (2011) or Cappellari et al. (2013a) for ATLAS^3D galaxies. Column 7: effective velocity dispersion derived by co-adding the spectra of the large-scale optical IFU data in elliptical annuli of the size of the effective radius. For ATLAS^3D galaxies taken from Cappellari et al. (2013a). Column 8: central velocity dispersion derived by co-adding the spectra of the high-spatial-resolution SINFONI IFU data in elliptical annuli within one arcsec. Column 9: bulge mass calculated by multiplying the bulge-to-total ratios from Krajnović et al. (2013) for ATLAS^3D galaxies or Gao et al. (2018) for the remaining galaxies with the total dynamical mass from Cappellari et al. (2013a) or this paper. Column 10: inclination from Cappellari et al. (2013a) for ATLAS^3D galaxies and Ho et al. (2011) for remaining galaxies. For NGC 584 from Laurikainen et al. (2010). Column 11: large-scale kinematics data that is used for the Schwarzschild dynamical models. The SAURON data comes from the ATLAS^3D galaxy survey.