Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833848]


Issue
A&A
Volume 623, March 2019
Article Number C3
Number of page(s) 1
Section Letters to the Editor
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833848e
Published online 22 March 2019

In our article (Rodger & Labrosse 2018) a small factor of π 3 $ \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{3}} $ is missing from Eq. (1). The correct expression for the absorption coefficient from thermal bremsstrahlung should read: κ ν = 1.77 × 10 2 n e ν 2 T 3 / 2 g ff i Z i 2 n i . $$ \begin{aligned} \kappa _{\nu } = 1.77\times 10^{-2}\frac{n_{\rm e}}{\nu ^2T^{3/2}}g_{\mathrm{ff} }\sum _i Z_i^2n_i. \end{aligned} $$(1)

The omission of the π 3 $ \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{3}} $ term in the published study does not change our analysis or the conclusions which we draw.The spectral gradient does not depend on it and thus the results from the models given in our analysis show simply a case with slightly lower optical thickness than would be expected.

References

  1. Rodger, A. S., & Labrosse, N. 2018, A&A, 617, L6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

© ESO 2019

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.