Example SED fits for LTGs (T > 0.5). Top row: galaxies whose SEDs have a large band coverage (≥25 datapoints), bottom row: those with a worse coverage (≤17 datapoints). Galaxies on the left have fits with χ2 at the peak of its distribution (0.3 < χ2 < 0.6), those on the right a worse fit with χ2 > 4. The blue lines show CIGALE’s best fit; both fabs Bayesian estimate (with uncertainty), used in the main text, and the estimate from best-fit parameters (i.e. the one describing the best fit itself) are reported. When available, we also show: in red, the MAGPHYS best fit (and Bayesian estimate of fabs); in purple, the piece-wise SED used for galaxies with very good data coverage (and the estimate of fabs by direct integration of it). For the alternative estimates, see Appendix A.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.